Employers and Manufacturers Association (EMA) Northern - Single resource consent process at risk

Single resource consent process at risk

24 Feb 2014
The draft Auckland Unitary Plan’s Cultural Impact Assessment provisions could allow unacceptable dual resource consent processes to develop, the Employers and Manufacturers Association says.
“As it stands the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan’s Cultural Impact Assessments (CIAs) would add uncertainty, cost and time delays to the issuing of resource consents,” said Kim Campbell, EMA’s chief executive. 

“They would deter investment and prevent businesses achieving the economic growth required under the city’s Economic Development Strategy,” Mr Campbell said.  

“The proposed Plan needs to be clarified and refined or we could see a dual resource consent process developing, one conducted by the Council, and another by iwi.  

“At present its far from clear how land and other resources subject to development would be treated under the Cultural Impact Assessments provision.

“We recommend that the proposed Unitary Plan is adjusted to give certainty to the processes required, place a cap on the costs involved, clearly identify a competent authority licensed to undertake these assessments, and a time table under which they must operate.

“Without these simple procedures a resource consent applicant has no way of knowing which iwi to engage with, what their requirements may be, or when their requirements might be provided.  

“The proposed Plan should list the relevant Mana Whenua that may be impacted, and remove the requirement for assessments to go to all potentially affected iwi for them to confirm that they are not adversely affected by a consent application.

“The Council’s proposed Plan at present falls short on a number of other factors including:

  • -> Lack of certainty. Under the present proposals it is almost impossible for applicants to determine whether Mana Whenua values exist in relation to a project or assess whether they may or may not be adversely affected.   

  • -> Discretion. Applicants will have to contact relevant Mana Whenua to determine whether a rule under the assessments applies. The rules are set out in Section 3, 2.7.4 of the proposed Plan.  

  • -> Consultation. The proposal contravenes s36A (1) (a) of the RMA as applicants are required to engage with Mana Whenua to prepare information. The RMA prohibits councils requiring an applicant to engage with a third party. 

  • -> Some resource applications may have effects which are so minor they should not be required to be assessed in line with s88 and schedule 4 of the RMA. These are not excluded from the ambit of the cultural assessments.  

  • -> The proposed Plan is unclear how anyone can undertake and/or apply for a Cultural Impact Assessment.  

“While business accepts that the community may want to protect many cultural assets with measures such as these, it seems only reasonable for the community to pay for the costs of their protection and not the business adversely affected.  

“The current proposed Unitary Plan would add significant extra processes, cost and risk on business for work for which the Council and the community at large should undertake.”  

Join Us.

Together we're building businesses, communities and opportunities for all
New Zealand

Download PDF form here
View subscription rates

Related News

09 Feb
It’s time for exporters to share their inspirational stories.
Read full story
25 Jan
Proposed changes to the current employment relations legislation remove flexibility the EMA believes is required to compete internationally.
Read full story
24 Jan
The EMA says it is great news the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) is back on track and expected to be signed in March.
Read full story
23 Jan
Business representatives on the pay equity working group have welcomed the resumption of work towards new pay equity legislation.
Read full story
06 Dec
In the 2017 EMA Employers Survey the tight labour market is the number one headache for employers, with overall business confidence softening compared with a year ago.
Read full story